Immigration in Sweden and in Swedish bibles

Will you, dear reader, excuse another vain post about this wretched country?

There are elections upcoming scheduled 9 September (2018) and the all-eclipsing issue is migration. The two largest parties used to be Socialdemokraterna (the Socialists) and the Moderates (moderate socialists). These two parties have led one political bloc each, and have taken turns accepting more and more immigrants into the 10-million-inhabitant state, against some fierce popular resistance.

Now as it happens, Socialdemokraterna is also the party which has the most influence over the church which was until year 2000 run by the government, and which has, for a legacy, more than half the population as members. Year 2000 is also the year when a government commission released a bible paraphrase which was intended to become the “leading bible-text for the Swedish language area”. It is called Bibel2000.

One of its many features is it renders MT: 讙专/ LXX: 蟺蟻慰蟽萎位蠀蟿慰蟼 as ‘immigrant’, in Swedish ‘invandrare’.

A consequence is it becomes hard for Christians to argue in favour of a more restrictive migration policy, since the burden of loving the 讙专/蟺蟻慰萎位蠀蟿慰蟼 as commanded in Torah is substantial, and whereas Christians aren’t bound by the law, it teaches them the principles and reasoning of God, so it cannot really be ignored.

The word ‘immigrant’ is rare in bible translations. Perhaps this is because the Christian’s perspective is global, which means that the prefix im- in ‘immigrant’ usually doesn’t make sense.

However the similar prefix shows up in the latin word advena, used a lot by Jerome in these places. Where the Old Latin version can be recreated from patristic and other authors who quoted it, ‘proselytus’ shows up in nine passages and ‘advena’ in six, in Sabatier’s edition.

Among the words in Greek that corresponds the best to ‘migrant’ would be 渭蔚蟿伪谓维蟽蟿畏蟼 ‘refugee’ and 蟺维蟻慰喂魏慰蟼 ‘exile’, as Moses described himself while he lived in Midian (Exodus 2:22). 螤伪蟻慰喂魏委伪 as a noun was used too to describe that which the Israelites were subject to when they were forced to migrate to Babylon and later encouraged to return (Ezra 8:35).

As 讙专 ger has a related verb 讙讜专 gur, meaning ‘to sojourn’/’to tarry’, it would not be farfetched to think that a ger could be a traveller of some sort. There exist many sorts of travellers, for example a stateless nation who live in the Nordic countries are called “The Travellers”, there are travelling salesmen, doctors, refugees, missionaries, proselytes and pilgrims, to mention but a few. Translating 讙专 by ‘migrants’ or ‘immigrants’ risk excluding these groups from the hospitality that the law seems to demand for their sake.

In contrast, the Divine Liturgy of St Chrysostom’s tradition reads:

峤櫹峤蚕 蟺位蔚蠈谓蟿蠅谓, 峤佄次课瓜慰蟻慰蠉谓蟿蠅谓, 谓慰蟽慰蠉谓蟿蠅谓, 魏伪渭谓蠈谓蟿蠅谓, 伪峒跋囄嘉蔽幌幭勏壩 魏伪峤 蟿峥喯 蟽蠅蟿畏蟻委伪蟼 伪峤愊勧慷谓, 蟿慰峥 魏蠀蟻委慰蠀 未蔚畏胃峥段嘉滴.
For seafaring [men], wanderers, ill, sick, captives and their salvation, let us pray to the Lord.

The mass-migration that fashion Europe of today has led to some forms of travelling getting harder. There are biometric passports, border controls, digital video surveillance, face recognition, more crime, more policemen, DNA-profiling, bodily searches and all sorts of anti-terror measures that weren’t needed back when Europe was mostly democratic.

So, in summary, somebody is probably very proud right now for having fooled most Swedish Christians by simply rewriting their holy scriptures. And it is dire.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *